| Date: |
May 1, 2006 |
| Contact: |
Gregg Losinski
(208) 525-7290 |
tough
conditions cause wildlife managers to reconsider options
for deer harvest in unit 67HEISE - Ever
since fawn survivability monitoring began back in 1998,
the fawns in Unit 67 near Heise have generally gone into
the winter heavier than most of the other fawns measured
in the state. Even with this head start, some died each
winter, but this year the numbers were the worst ever
recorded and have caused wildlife managers to reconsider
some deer harvest changes that had already been printed
in the new 2006 big game regulations.
According to Regional Wildlife Manager Daryl Meints,
"It's important to take note how numbers vary from area
to area. The deer at Heise had an especially tough
winter; this has caused us to recommend changing some
deer hunting opportunity that we had previously hoped to
expand." The expansion Meints was referring to centers
around two controlled hunts and will not impact
previously published regulations for general deer
harvest in Unit 67. The Idaho Fish & Game Commission
will consider approving a request to reduce the number
of permits originally set for Hunt 1058 from 200 back to
50 permits. Hunt 1061 will be reduced from 200 to 100
permits.
Prior
to this winter, the Heise area was carrying more deer
than had been counted since 1995. According to Meints,
"The fawns came into the winter lighter than previous
years. This was due to diminished summer and fall
habitat conditions."
Of the 25 fawns' radio collared as part of the
survivability study, 21 have so far ended up dying; 12
died of malnutrition, 4 from coyote predation, 1 from
mountain lion and 4 more from unknown causes.
Unintentional human disturbance, along with poaching,
was determined to be having a negative impact on the
wintering deer; so earlier this winter when it appeared
that the deer were heading into trouble, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) worked with IDFG to establish an
area closure to try and provide the remaining deer as
much protection as possible.
These controlled hunts being adjusted reflect how
wildlife managers attempt to use all the information
available to them to manage wildlife populations and
provide hunting opportunity to sportsmen. Population
swings such as seen here only serve to drive home the
point that wildlife cannot be stockpiled, surpluses need
to be utilized when they are available because of the
variety of factors that could cause a downward swing at
any time in the future.
For more information about these changes or
information related to the fawn survivability study,
contact
IDFG in Idaho Falls at 208-525-7290.
|