Why do we support anti-hunters?

Why we support the TRUE Anti-Hunter.
Seriously...

The true anti-hunter has passed the litmus test that one must take not be a hypocrite.
They are one that can take the pulpit with a true conviction and transparency in their total life and environment. They take no life of any sort in their daily survival or existence. They do not judge which life is worth saving and which may die for their needs. Their protection of "life" extends to all living creatures regardless of them being "in the wild" or on a farm.  

Example: If a preacher was to give a sermon on Sunday morning and then leave the church with his crack whores, we would call him a hypocrite.

They same applies to the anti-hunter or the one preaching against the taking of  game animals.

Because one doesn?t hunt, does not mean they don?t kill. Removing oneself from the actual ?killing? process simply means they hire an assassin to do the killing for them. They pay someone else to ?kill? for them so they may remain ?pure?.

If one wears a belt made of leather, they are wrapped in the blood of their assassin?s work. If they have one pair of shoes made of animal skin, again they walk in blood all day. If they have a pet that eats pet food made with animal products, again they feed their babies the blood of their assassin?s work. What killer did they hire to make sure their cars and suv's had seats made from the skin of an animal?

Removing yourself from the actual ?act? of the killing is merely a sign of the times. Our meat in the supermarket is packaged very carefully not to show blood on the wrapping. Never will you see a picture of a cow on the steak identifying the type of animal.
If we as a society were forced to view the actual killing of the animals that we "used", our nation would come to a screeching halt. We are a "pure" nation that allows others to do our dirty work.  

One can also not ?pass the test? if they take any life at all.

Who is to judge which life has more importance? Is the beautiful tuna swimming free in the ocean any less a great creature than a deer in the woods? Is a chicken ?less? of a life than an elk because it is small? The pure ?life saver" takes no life at all. To them we give our utmost respect. They have made a total choice and conviction that holds true to any candling. To those that fail the test of the non-killer, we simply call them a hypocrite.

Before most of these criers attend their shallow meetings and protests, they make sure that their wallets get switched out so not to be leather. They wear only the proper shoes, while the others get hidden deep in the closet.

Once in a while some of these individuals try and through religion into the mix, saying that God would not want you to kill his creatures. If that is the case, then Jesus was a sinner. He participated in acts of murder. He told assassins to throw their nets on the other side of the boat to murder thousands of fish. When he fed the masses, he did so with a loaf of bread and murdered fish.

In Deuteronomy 14:4-5 the Scriptures state, ?These are the animals you may eat: the ox, the sheep, the goat, the deer, the gazelle, the roe deer, the wild goat, the ibex, the antelope and the mountain sheep.?  This text and others in the Bible make it clear that deer and various other types of wild animals were permissible to eat.  We also know that shortly after the great flood in Noah?s day God blessed Noah and his sons and then told them, ?Everything that lives and moves will be food for you.  Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything? (Genesis 9:3).  God expanded the menu of permissible food from what it had been prior to the flood.

Not preaching, just responding to those that email us that feel they are God's chosen disciples for the anti-hunting movement.

To those of you that pass the test; I give you my utmost respect and adoration. You may take the pulpit and shout as loud as you would like. To the others I simply say, ?ssssshhhhhhhhh.? Quiet please?  I'm hunting.